17

Advice for the Individual vs. Society

Simple concept that is important to strategic thinking: advice that you might give to an individual may not be appropriate advice for society at large, and vice versa. Simple enough right?

It should be, but I see people mixing up the two all the time. It’s important to keep them separate.

It’s no secret that I am pretty liberal when it comes to politics and am generally supportive of social welfare,affirmative action, safety nets and corporate regulations. So sometimes people are surprised and confused when I talk entrepreneurship, independence, looking for opportunity, and generally pulling oneself up by ones own boot-straps, which all sound like conservative ideals.

The thing is that looking for opportunities and pulling yourself up is good advice for an individual in poverty. Do not wait for a handout, make or take whatever opportunity you can grab and make a better life for yourself. This makes total sense if you have a person in front of you asking for advice on how to make his life better. It is however a terrible plan when discussing impoverished cities or minority populations. They very fact that someone is even in a position where they are looking for advice on how to get ahead, or even in a head-space that this seems possible, means that they are already in a better spot than most most.

Similarly, while I think that plans aimed at eliminating the wealth gap, higher minimum wage, social welfare, equal pay laws, and affirmative action policies are great things for society it is absolutely shit advice to give to individuals looking to make their way in the world. It is one thing to think that fast food workers as a whole deserve better pay, it is quite another to tell the person you know who works at McDonalds that he should stick around and wait for it. See what I am saying?

But it’s not just about wealth. Recently the issue has come up regarding Rape.

You might have read about the four guys at North California State that invented a nail polish that detects the presence of date rape drugs. This is getting a lot of press not only because the great potential it has in preventing rape, but because certain Rape Crisis groups are NOT endorsing the invention. Here again is a conflict between a solution for an individual and a solution to a societal problem.

I absolutely agree that the victim is not to blame in cases of rape, and when women are raped people look for any reason to blame the victim or demand that women defend themselves rather than for men not to rape. Even though the problem of rape in society should not be solved by telling women to fight harder, an individual woman can benefit greatly from having tools to detect rape drugs and defend herself from attackers. To endorse a method for individual protection is not the same as shifting responsibility to the victim. Most people would agree that knowing martial arts and how to defend yourself is a good skill, but few would say that those who don’t are responsible for violence that happens to them. Sadly, this does happen with rape victims, but I will still be teaching my daughter how to defend herself and using any tools and tricks to prevent her from being raped.

But as I said, good advice for an individual is not always good for society at large. For instance Miss Nevada last year was asked what to do about rape on college campus’s and her answer was: “Myself, as a fourth-degree black belt, I learned from a young age that you need to be confident and be able to defend yourself. And I think that’s something that we should start to really implement for a lot of women.

Again, if she was talking to someone who asked her “what can I do to help prevent me from being raped?” but she wasn’t. She was asked what to do about rape on college campus’s – telling all women to become fourth degree black belts is just not reasonable and shifts the narrative back on the victim rather than the perpetrators.

Advice for society and advice for the individual should not always be the same. 

So why am I writing about this on a Sorcery Blog?

Because I see students and other sorcerers confusing the two things over and over with their magic. One person I know of refuses to use magic to further their career because they are afraid of adding to the income gap while others are suffering. On the flip side, I know someone who left a group that was enchanting for more help to a certain area in need because he felt that they should “pull themselves up”.

When planning magic or living life realize that good advice for an individual is not always good for society as a whole, and vice-versa.

 

Click Here to Leave a Comment Below 17 comments
Robert

You make an excellent point here. Excellent.

Reply
John Stein

In regards to your daughter and her self defense; one word : Ju-Jitsu. It makes a person dangerous from the rape position. And if the lessons are devopled at a young age, the vocabulary and grammar of those movements stick around for life. I just recently fell off my bike, highschool ju-jitsu kept me from breaking my wrists… 😉

Reply
John Stein

Oh, and Rhonda Rousey may be the single best role model for women since Maya Angelou.

Reply
Fanny Fae

I am always astonished at how your advice is exactly what I need at precisely the right moment. Thank you.

Reply
Sorcerer

As I recall, there were a number of large-scale attempts at “eliminating the wealth gap” in the 20th century, and the result was that everyone became poor. I’m a little baffled by communist sorcery, since to me the sorcerer is the opposite of a communist, being an enterprising, creative individual who strives to create gaps between herself and the rest of society. Maybe talk to some people who have actually lived under systems that tried eliminate the wealth gap, and ask them how magical their lives were…

Reply
    inominandum

    We are not talking communism, we are talking tax policy and programs. The fact is that the golden age of Americana in the 50s and early 60s that everyone hearkens back to – the age of increased quality of living and financial wellness for everyone, was created by higher taxes on those that gained the most from society.

    “Job creators” don’t create jobs wiyh extra money, jobs are created by work needing to be done, which only happens when the populace has disposable income. You cannot have a consumer economy with no consumers.

    The fact that ANY regulation or tax immediately sets people yammering about communism is the largest part of the problem. Its communism to offer tax funded health care, but not communism to offer tax funded police and fire… Its a false choice.

    Reply
Vee

Great post and great thoughts. I would offer additionally that the scenario isn’t binary. Things aren’t good for me OR good for society. What it sounds like you’re saying is that to strengthen the self can be perceived as at odds with society at large. I’ve definitely had that thought process myself. What your post (and previous work) has helped me realize is there’s a false dichotomy regarding self vs society. My own studies and experiences have resonated with this idea. Strengthening the self is a different process than taking action on a global scale; however, as society is a collection of disparate “selfs”, doing work to make yourself a stronger person physically mentally or spiritually can only contribute to society in a way to strengthen it. Two logical fallacies I saw myself falling into when I started examining my reticence to do work on myself “at the expense of the whole” was (1) not recognizing that strengthening myself IS helping society, just one individual at a time, and (2) An assumption that I understood the consequences of my actions and those consequences were limited in energy and potential–for example if I do a working to get a job, I’m necessarily and unfairly stopping someone else from getting a job, and that’s the end of the story. Logically, my “IF this THAN that” concept was wrong. It was a limiting world view. It’s not necessarily true that’s the way it works–For example, once that job connection is made, “reality” has changed. Perhaps I’ll rocket to the top of the organization and create jobs along the way. Perhaps the person that got passed over will create their own company that’s a better fit for their skills. Perhaps the hiring manager will love me and that other person so much they’ll hire two people. Perhaps passed-over-guy will get a different job and meet the love of his life. None of those things might have happened, had I not done my working. Of course, things may not come up roses for anyone–maybe I’ll have a horrible wretched boss and that person that didn’t get hired won’t have to deal with that…etc. The point is, I love this article because it highlights how individual and social needs are different but not necessarily at odds, and even if the course of action or advice might be different on a social level or individual, there can be a universal observation that when looking to create change in conformity with Will, it’s more helpful to focus on the actor than the victim. Thanks for writing!

Reply
Rose

Thank you for this well written post, Jason. As a survivor of multiple rapes, I’ll tell you, and your readers in all honesty that even if this product were on the market way back then, I’d never thought to use it! No one I knew would ever do a thing like that to me, surely not!

What most people forget is that only a very small fraction of rape/sexual assaults are “stranger danger” type events, although date rape certainly happens… yet not always in the kind of environment in which someone could use this product.

With this being said, most of us go out believing nothing like that is going to happen to us. It’s only when we’re, quite unfortunately, proven wrong when a product like the nail polish begins to make sense, yet by then, the perpetrator has already achieved their main goal: stolen something they had no right to take by forcing (or coercing) to gain power over another.

This is oppression. Though I agree the four guys came up with a good idea in general, it isn’t a solution to a societal, and institutional (military and college, especially) problem.

Reply
    Inominandum

    Completely agreed. Which is one of the reasons for the post. People confuse the two.

    Reply
      Sarrow

      Or the invention could end the the reason for such support groups to exist, thus ending the money they make

      Reply
        inominandum

        The invention would never do that. Also, they don’t make money. So, no.

        Reply
        Diotima Mantineia

        Rape crisis centers don’t make money — they scramble to find funding to support their much-needed efforts, and rely heavily on volunteers.

        Reply
Ulysses

This is the first time I’ve enjoyed an article on social issues. This makes sense to me. Very useful. I generally get pretty bored of politics and social issues but this was great!

Reply
home decorators collection

Great write-up, I¡¦m regular visitor of one¡¦s site, maintain up the nice operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a lengthy time.

Reply
15781587158515761575157832157516041605161015751607

I want to appreciate this really excellent read!! I definitely loved every small bit of it. I have you bookmarked your internet site to look at the fresh stuff you post.

Reply
goedkoop woning isoleren

Intersting post and site. Very good that Google listed so i was able to get here. This website will go no in my bookmarks from now.

Reply
Pinoy Teleseryes

I’m writing to make you know of the fabulous encounter my wife’s child undergone going through the blog. She realized a great number of things, not to mention what it’s like to have an exceptional giving spirit to make certain folks just learn certain very tough topic areas. You undoubtedly surpassed readers’ desires. Several thanks for presenting the helpful, trustworthy, revealing and as nicely as easy ideas about this topic to Sandra.

Reply

Leave a Reply: