12

Anthrocentrism

I was having a conversation with someone this weekend who has experience in western hermetic magic but who spent a year or two studying Buddhism but decided it was not for him. The reason he gave was interesting:

“I think the biggest issue I had with Tibetan Buddhism was that humanity doesnt seem to have any special place in the universe. I mean there are countless realms of existence, and possibilities for rebirth, and even in this universe they talk about life on other planets and which ones Dharma is taught on etc. In Hermeticism mankind is sort of central top the cosmology. You are born with guardian angels, there is a direct progression from the highest sphere down to the earth which is at the center of the spheres. This reflects how I feel.”

Without getting into a right/wrong argument here, his statement pretty adequately reflects what I DO like about Buddhism. When i look at the earth in the solar system, in the galaxy and in the universe – the idea of concentric spheres that I am at the center of just doesnt hold water. It does in a very subjective way – as representing a path for the aspirant – but not in any cosmological way. I find the idea that humanity is just one possible re-birth, and earth just one possible planet, to ring more true than an Anthrocentric view. I cannot buy into a creation scheme or cosmology that is “all about us”.

I think that in a way, this is the spiritual appeal that Lovecraft has to some magicians as well.

Not sure why I even posted this, but I was thinking about it.

Click Here to Leave a Comment Below 12 comments
ioannis

hello jason!!!!
The Six Realms are an allegorical description of conditioned existence, or samsara, into which beings are reborn. The nature of one’s existence is determined by karma. Some realms seem more pleasant than others — heaven sounds preferable to hell — but all are dukkha, meaning they are temporary and imperfect.
but
according to the traditional teachings the only way to liberate from the conditioned existence is through a birth in the human realm.
can it get anymore anthropocentric?

Reply
    Sky Serpent

    @ioannis

    Liberation from the conditioned state of existence is possible in every realm being. It is just that the human realm is optimal: there is not too much pleasure, so one also pays attention to the nasty things in life and there is enough freedom to work towards liberation.

    Being in the human ream does not require one to be a human being. Any being with the capability to complex enough mental function will do, I’m sure.

    In addition, the six realm are within each other. In a sense it is a fractal structure. I.e. your life can have god realm like conditions but your mind lives in the hell realms and so on.

    Reply
Inominandum

Things are a bit more complex than the 6 realms of Buddhism 101. There are more heavens, hells, and possible types of rebirth to be liberated from than you would imagine. There are Nagas that have become liberated as well as beings from other classes. This does not touch on the other planets etc.

Reply
ioannis

you are both right but my point was that being a human in the human buddhist teaching is a very good thing…..

Reply
    S

    yeah but it mainly for motivation in your practice……….
    Remember the 1st of the 4 preliminaries: the precious human birth?
    Its the 1st thing you learn for a reason
    Dharma is supposed to make you more humble, if it makes you more self centered your doing something wrong.

    Reply
      ioannis

      how can you become more self centered just because they motivate you that you must grab the chance of this precious birth?
      i dont get your point….

      Reply
Rachel Izabella

Thank you, Jason! In conversations with comrade sorcerers their anthropocentrism and
Earth-centrism maddens me. The physical Mundum AKA Kosmos ends neither 60 miles “up” where space begins nor 890 million miles “up” where Saturn orbits. My gut feeling is it’s infinite in fact, both in space and time, making humanity as small as possible: i.e., in comparison, of zero size and duration. But I’ll let the cosmologists and physicists puzzle out the truth of such things.

Reply
solxyz

Fascinating subject. I can see both sides, but since Jason has already presented the non-anthropocentric case – which I also think tends to dominate in our modern understanding of the world – let me present the other side. I tend to think of this in terms of Daoist idea of Man as the being which stands between Heaven and Earth. If you look around this world, humans are in fact uniquely unique: with our faces, throats, and hands adapted for symbolic manipulation, our lack of adaption to any specific ecological task, and our grasp of abstraction, we are beings which can recognize our transcendence and universality even while being fully physical beings. There may be other planets or realms where other beings have these properties – I dont know and it doesnt really matter, because for us “Human” is the great symbol of this synthesis.

For me, the great value of reflecting on the cacophany of worlds and realms is not so much that it decenters Humanity, but that it decenters our personal and specific experiences. It encourages me to let my humanity expand so that it can accept and include any of the vast possibilities of experience that reality offers. Indeed, true humanity calls for such a universality.

Reply
jingjo

Some great comments and a good musing. I was thinking exactly the same thing about what you appreciated in Tibetan Buddhism (ie Lamaism or Tantric Buddhism, I am guessing). I love and relish the idea that we are not special – each creature has its own experience and while it is distinct – and certainly we react differently, it is nice to be reminded of our place. As human it is too easy to let your worldview come back to the tight orbit of your own being and experience. I like something that continually reminds me of the vastness of existence. Similar to what solxyz said, I think.

Reply
Lavanah

This is exactly why Hermeticism feels uncomfortable to me. It reflects a religio/political hierarchy that I have never accepted.

Reply
M.G.

This is funny because I always considered Buddhism the most anthropocentric and human-oriented of the various world religions. (Which I don’t consider a bad thing.). Apart from the emphasis on the preciousness of human birth, it also more or less uniquely denies the reality of an absolute God, teaches that human teachers are more important than the gods, and traces its lineage to a fully human founder – admittedly, this gets blurred a bit – whose attainment can theoretically be equalled by any ordinary human. There are also the various stories of realized humans teaching, or sometimes smiting, the gods.

Reply
berkey water filter systems

Hiya, I am really glad I’ve found this info. Today bloggers publish just about gossip and internet stuff and this is actually irritating. A good blog with exciting content, this is what I need. Thanks for making this web site, and I’ll be visiting again. Do you do newsletters? I Can not find it.

Reply

Leave a Reply: