24

Wandering Bishops and the Book of Abrasax

I have been getting a lot of questions over the last couple weeks about my consecration as a Gnostic Bishop at Crucible. I thought I might take a moment to answer them here on the blog. It is a particularly auspicious day to do so because the Book of Abrasax by Mike Cecchetelli is finally shipping!

See my review of it here. 

Read more about this amazing work from the author himself here. Of particular interest is his recent evocation of Abrasax and the four Luminaries. The first working I did from his book was his Rite of Kindling the Four Lights, and I have repeated this rite many times since getting the book. I think that going forward the Luminaries, which have been pretty much ignored in western magic, are going to start shining their light in many home temples soon.

So what does all this have to do with my consecration as a Gnostic Bishop?

I believe, and have for some time, that the rite of consecration is similar in many ways to Tantric Abhisheka: it is a direct passing from person to person through lines of succession that extend back to an enlightened master. In the case of Tantric Samaya it goes back to a Mahasiddha. In the case of apostolic succession it extends person to person back to the original disciples of Christ.

As to what gets passed it boils down to power, spiritual authority, and subtle keys that access certain functions peculiar to the lineage. Apart from the sacramental functions that a Priest or Bishop performs, he also performs exorcisms and has other types of contact with the spirits and angels. After my Priest consecration a few years ago, I noted a different dynamic when dealing with spirits, especially when done using symbols and language of the Grimoires, most of which were written by and for Clergy, who would possess the type of consecration I am talking about. The Bishop consecration is different from that of a priest. Apart from the administrative duties that would come with being the Bishop of a functioning church, it is a full participation in the lineage of succession, making you able to bless Chrysm, and pass on the ordination to others. In every way equal to the Bishop that consecrated you, or any other Bishop. This also has a weight of service to it that I will write about at a later date. Suffice to say that the line of Christ is a fusing of the line of Kings with the line of Priests, and a Priest King has responsibilities not just to other people, but to the spiritual church as well.

When I performed the Kindling of the Lights after my consecration, it was like looking at them in HD. A whole different flow of messages started coming through all four of them, not just Eleleth – who had been the only one who spoke previously. Though I do not believe that you need this type of consecration to work Gnostic magic texts or Christian grimoires – it definitely puts a different spin on it.

So what Church are you a Bishop of?

The ultimate answer is that I am a Bishop of the one true Church, as are all Bishops. How this translates on earth however is another matter. I do not belong to any organization and am a true Episcopus Vagans – a wandering Bishop. You can read a brief description of what this means here.

Who Consecrated you?

Tau Shawn Knight consecrated me. Since Shawn is not the most vocal person on the net I made sure that Andireh Vitimus, Rufus Opus, as well as their better halves were in attendance as witnesses, just so you know I was not making shite up.

He in turn was consecrated by +Allen Greenfield whose details are here.  +Don Correll who was one of Grady McMurtry’s Roomates. +Mar Thomas, who is a bishop of the AJC currently serving as Primate of the United States of America.

Are you going to start your own Church?

No. Probably not. I may become a Gnostic Televangelist if there is money in it:-)

Seriously though, I have performed a lot of different versions of the Liturgy, and I one of the things that I want to work on in the future is a version of the Liturgy that combines more time for contemplation into the rite itself. The Logos will guide me when the time is right.

In the meantime, get out there and get a copy of Mikes new book and start tapping into the Hidden God of the Gnostics: АВРАΣАΞ ΑΒΛΑΝΑΘΑΝΑΛΒΑ !

 

Click Here to Leave a Comment Below 24 comments
Frater IV

Where could a person learn about what kind of requirements are necessary to meet in order to get consecrated as a Bishop? I’m sure Bishops don’t go around passing on the lineage to just anyone, so how do they decide? Is there a criteria or is it just who you know?

Reply
Frater Benedict

Dear Jason,
I do not want to be persnickety, but ‘episcopi’ is the plural form, while ‘episcopus’ is the singular form. That means that you are an ‘episcopus vagans’. When gathering with your consecrator you are together ‘episcopi vagantes’.

Anyhow, I wish to congratulate, and I hope that that the esoterical kernel you intend to nurture and transmit in this way also will find an exoterical outflow in service to fellow humans. Have you considered using the Liturgy of St. Dionysius, perhaps?

Reply
    Inominandum

    Thanks for the correction. That’s what I get for making posts while I am doing three other things. Unfortunately this week it is either do that, or make no posts at all.

    I have used the Liturgy of St Dionysis, and while I love the treatment of the Angelology in the rite, there is still something missing. I have used the Harard Mass, the Liberal Catholic Liturgy, and JSM Wards Mass.

    Reply
Michael Redmond

Hi, Jason, the singular is episcopus vagans, the plural is episcopi vagantes. In Roman ecclesiology, the episcopacy is understood as being a personal power, but this isn’t true for all other churches in undisputed apostolic succession (neither was it true for Rome, early on). In the East and elsewhere, the episcopacy is understood as being a ~corporate~ power, a power shared among all bishops in communion, so if you’re not in communion (i.e., recognized) by the other canonical bishops in your jurisdiction, you’re not a bishop at all, no matter what ceremonies were performed. This understanding is visibly demonstrated in many churches’ canons of episcopal consecration, which require as many bishops as possible to assist at the consecration of a new bishop. I once attended an Eastern Orthodox episcopal consecration that involved some 20 bishops. It was some show, let me tell you. The canons of the Anglican Communion (the Episcopal Church in the U.S.) require no less than three. You still see this at RC episcopal consecrations as a carry-over from Rome’s original ecclesiology, which passed away with the emergence of the doctrine of papal supremacy. Just thought you might be interested.

Reply
    Inominandum

    Thanks Michael. The tense mistake was a result of me doing too many things at once.

    Independent Catholic Bishops are certainly recognized by each other. The actions would be considered Valid but Illicit by Rome.

    That said, most Gnostics and Independent Catholics look back to the original Bishops and the time before much of the dogma and doctrine that various churches have placed upon the church. The original office was that of Bishop and each Bishop was fully independent and able to establish forms and doctrines necessary to the culture they encountered.

    There are a lot of Gnostic Churches out there. Some do require a profession of faith, and I gave one but certainly not the Nicean Creed. It does require that you have been baptized, and received the orders for Deacon and Priest. There is no fee.

    Reply
      Frater Benedict

      I have to disagree with you in a lesser detail here, Jason. Not even before Nicaea 325 AD were bishops ‘fully independent’.

      You are right that the centralization of the Patriarchy of the West (and its, in Eastern Orthodox eyes, erroneous, claim to be the entire Church) does not date before the times of Gregory VII (1073-1085) and Calixtus II (1119-1124). Already in the third century, however, the bishops of the patriarchal sees (Rome, Alexandria, Antioch) were held in special honour (although without any other formal powers than being chairmen when their neighbouring bishops gathered). Already in the second century neighbouring bishops gathered together if there was need to solve conflicts – the calendar conflict of the 180’s for instance. Constantinople and Jerusalem were not added to the other three Patriarchal sees until 451 AD.

      It would then be better to describe it as ‘each Bishop had a considerable degree of independence, but had, if needed, to answer before a provincial synod (i.e. the dioceses in the neighbouring region) of his peers’.

      The liberty of each bishop was most clearly demonstrated in matters of ritual and liturgy. Before 1570 AD, each diocese in Western Europe used its own version of the Mass. These diocesan versions were, of course, rather similar (liturgies in Toledo and Milano differing in a greater extent), but in principle it was the responsibility of the bishop to decide the exact words, tools and symbolical gestures used in worship. This pertained to the daily office, the sacraments and the lesser rites as well. In reality bishops felt obliged to adhere to and transmit prayers and rites of venerable age, and seldom invented new hymns, prayers, tools or symbolical actions without hearing the advice of the cathedral chapter. Prestigious sees often influenced less famous neighbour dioceses. Liturgical change was therefore slow, but far from stagnant.

      In the Eastern Orthodox churches this ius liturgicum of the bishops is seen even today in the differences between churches following a Greek version of the Byzantine rite (the Church of Constantinople and Church of Greece, for instance), and churches following a Slavonic version of the Byzantine rite (the Russian Orthodox Church and the Serbian Orthodox Church, for instance). Before the 1200’s liturgical diversity was greater than so in the eastern churches: The Eastern Orthodox Patriarchy of Alexandria abolished the Liturgy of St. Mark, and adopted the Byzantine rite at that time. In a similar way, at that time the The Eastern Orthodox Patriarchy of Antioch abolished the liturgies that survive in the Maronite Church, and adopted the Byzantine rite.

      When it comes to doctrinal liberty, it was greater early on, compared with later developments, but that doesn’t mean that early bishops were entirely indifferent in doctrinal matters. That famous Proto-Gnostic (and Proto-Orthodox) called St. Paul, wrote an encyclica called ‘Letter to the Galatians’ when some leaders in the Galatian Church insisted on circumcision of Gentiles. In the 130’s and 140’s Marcionites gravitated together, and several different Proto-Orthodox regional churches gravitated together to something similar to what today is communions or denominations. The conflicts surrounding Encratites, Ebionites, Nazarenes, Basilidians, Alogi, Valentinians, Montanists, Novatians and Donatists made them to emerge as separate communions or denominations as well. I suppose there is some principle that hold together Gnostic Communions as well, even if it is minimized to a family resemblance or the sharing of an inner gnostic experience.

      By the way, I am curious about the liturgy of JSM Ward. Were may I find it in print?

      Reply
Michael Redmond

Now you’ve gotten me curious . Does the Gnostic church require a profession of faith for episcopal consecration, such as the Nicene Creed or what’s known as “the Apostles’ Creed”? Does it require that an ordinand have been baptized? Does it charge a fee?

Reply
Andrew Watt

Congratulations, your Grace. You’re now the second bishop I know who received an illicit but valid consecration in the eyes of Rome; sounds like fun!

I prepped partway for priesthood in the Anglican Communion, but stopped short of taking the ordination examination, or becoming even a deacon. In the technical terminology I supposed I’m a “spoiled priest” — a person who knows enough to be a member of the priesthood, but isn’t. A clerk who isn’t clergy.

Reply
Michael Redmond

Jason, Frater Benedict is correct in his long post above, e.g., “It would then be better to describe it as ‘each Bishop had a considerable degree of independence, but had, if needed, to answer before a provincial synod (i.e. the dioceses in the neighbouring region) of his peers’.” The idea that “The original office was that of Bishop and each Bishop was fully independent and able to establish forms and doctrines necessary to the culture they encountered” is simply untrue. This is not the record of history. The episcopate was collegial in nature from the start. Even the apostles, from whom the episcopate derives its authority, formed a “board of directors,” with Peter as chairman (Acts 15). The decisions of councils and synods are binding on their members, in other words, collegial decisions rule. Council and synods can depose and have deposed bishops.

Reply
inominandum

Hi Michael. I already thanked the good frater for his correction. I am not claiming that I have regular orders, thus the valid but illicit.

Reply
    Frater Benedict

    Michael’s message still has a point. What happens if any Gnostic bishop (Deity forbids!) would be found guilty of sexual abuse, for instance (The hypothetical example is not unheard of in neither churches nor scout movements). Wouldn’t other bishops in the Neo-Gnostic continuum administrate disciplinary measures, in order to protect the Gnostic laity?

    Reply
      inominandum

      Well there are several levels at which action is taken. First and foremost is legal action, which is actually in my opinion, more likely to be taken quickly in a small congregation of people with independent clergy than in a large organization that can easily apply pressure to hide such abuse, or move officials around to different positions out of the jurisdiction in which the abuse occurred as is the case with some other Churches in the news.

      Next there can be disciplinary action from within a church, depending on how large and structured that church is. The Apostolic Johannite Church for example I am sure has systems in place for such actions.

      If there is not a large system in place, or if a Bishop has started a fully independent church or something like that than the Gnostic or Independent Catholic Community (Old Catholic Church of Utrect, Liberal Catholic Church, and other groups that are not necessarily Gnostic persay) would I am sure shun a person acting in such a manner.

      Reply
        Monsignor Scott Rassbach

        To expand on Jason’s comment, the Apostolic Johannite does have a clear policy on sex offenders, which is laid out in our FAQ.

        What does your church do to protect children?
        Convicted sex offenders are explicitly barred from holding leadership positions within the Apostolic Johannite Church, and we screen seminarians and clergy through local, national and international background checks, including criminal record checks and sex offender listings.

        In addition to this, the AJC also maintains very strict policies ensuring, where possible, that no individuals are placed at risk through the participation of laity that are known to the community to have committed sexual or violent offenses. Should the latter seek the ministry of our Church or clergy, this is done in an environment apart from those at risk.

        Reply
          Thomas Langley

          The issue of sexual abuse is a serious one, and we’ve all witnessed the fallout from the willful negligence of the Roman Catholic Church in dealing with the issue.

          Having labored in the world of the Gnostic Ecclesia for several years, I’m relieved to see the policies in place by our own Church (the Alexandrian Gnostic Church) and the Apostolic Johannite Church to protect their communities from sexual predators, policies that are much stricter and effective that those currently in place by the Roman Church, which has an unfortunate record of covering up pedophilia and relocating or even promoting clergy accused of criminal acts.

          Reply
+Dositheos

Congratulations to you. We share common fellowship. I was consecrated by T Allen and also separately, sub conditione, by Bishop +Thomas Langely. Bishop Shawn Knight was consecrated in a home temple where I live (I was present for the occasion). And I know Don Correll and have met many clergy and laity of the AJC as well, including Mar +Thomas and Monsignor Scott. Small world. Peace and Blessings to you.

Reply
Myo Gak (+Tau Iohannes)

I thought I’d join in the public congratulations – welcome to the +club!

Myogak / +Tau Iohannes

Reply
Tau Mikael III Basilides

AXIOS, AXIOS, AXIOS! Many Years, Eminence, Many Years!

Reply
all exclusive vacations

Valuable information. Lucky me I discovered your site accidentally, and I am stunned why this accident did not happened earlier! I bookmarked it.

Reply
16031588160132157815871585157615751578321605161015751607

This really is genuinely interesting, You’re a really skilled blogger. I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking a lot more of your magnificent post. Also, I’ve shared your internet internet site in my social networks!

Reply
Porn

Just wanna remark that you have a very good web internet site , I like the layout it actually stands out.

Reply
tralki plastikowe

Outstanding post, you have pointed out some excellent details , I likewise think this s a very wonderful website.

Reply
Randolf@bing.com

Generally I do not read article on blogs, but I wish to say that this write-up very forced me to try and do it! Your writing style has been surprised me. Thanks, quite nice post.

Reply
Hoppes@bing.com

Hi there, just became aware of your weblog through Google, and located that it’s truly informative. I’m going to be careful for brussels. I will be grateful when you continue this in future. Numerous people will be benefited out of your writing. Cheers!

Reply

Leave a Reply: