8

The Business of Magic

256301_10151301343287995_445051069_oBy now most of my readers will have heard about the arrest of E.A. Koetting. I had decided yesterday to not comment on it. Beyond finding the people getting their joy out of his suffering to be reprehensible, I really have no opinion one way or the other. Because I was interviewed by him and let an article be published in his anthology some people have written me privately for inside info which I do not have. The interview and article were not an endorsement for anything beyond my own ideas. That said I found him to be good-nurtured, knowledgeable, and smart. I wish him well in what I am sure is a very difficult time.  That’s about all I have to say on him.

That said, one of the things coming out of this fiasco is an examination of the business of magic. Many of the people taking joy in his suffering do so because they felt that he cheapened the art by crass, and even manipulative salesmanship. I also was not a fan of his marketing tactics and held it out in my mind as an extreme that I seek to avoid.

On the other hand though you have people, even those who offer services and products of their own, who bristle at the idea of anything businesslike ever touching magic. For instance in Aarom Leitch’s recent piece Fall of a Living God he lists three pieces of advice for those making a living. I agree with the first two and half of the third. I believe in being real and not over promising, I believe in quality over quantity of content, and I believe in avoiding the tactics of televangelists and scientologists. But then, he takes it to a place that I think is no so good:

“Your webpage or blog should look like a resource for students and researchers; it should not look like an ad.

This for me is a problem. If you are in business, you are in business. You should be up front about what you are selling and that you are selling it. There is nothing wrong with this.

Personally I HATE reading an article only to find that it was a sales pitch in disguise. Not only do I immediately dismiss everything you just said, but I will not buy your product, and I will leave feeling like you ripped off my time. If you are in business then sell. Don’t make it appear like a resource for students and researchers. You will either piss people off when you reveal that you are pitching them something, or not actually sell anything because you are so busy hiding that you are trying to make a living.

You will note that on this blog sales pitches for myself or others are clear and straightforward. Articles for content are there for content – I don’t even end them with a “to find out more buy my….” because if you read the blog, you already know that.

Personally I find the model of selling books, courses, services, and personal instruction to be part of my spiritual path. I find it to be more honest and straightforward than orders where you only advance if you kiss the right ass or are willing to jump through increasingly ridiculous hoops. I find it more honest than Guru’s who will recognize you as an incarnation for the right sum of money. I find it more honest than those who insist that it all must be done for free – just when they get around to it.

I am an occultist for a living. This is my job, and I do not hold a day-job. I will not apologize for it. I pride myself on providing value at fair prices to people, only accepting work that I think I can help with, and occasionally doing something pro-bono when the need is real.
It may not fit the fantasy of Victorian Era Gentlemen meeting at the Lodge, and never sullying themselves with anything as crass as money, but the reality is that the world we live in operates this way. Aaron says that he would like to make his living as an occultist. While I agree with him that money cannot be the first thing you are about, if you are actually hoping to pay your bills and live a financially stable life, it had damn well better be a close second. This is true not just of magic and occultism, but all business. Placing money first corrupts, but placing money to the side bankrupts.

 

Click Here to Leave a Comment Below 8 comments
Stone Dog

“Placing money first corrupts, but placing money to the side bankrupts.”

I like the sound of that. You should put that in the next edition of Financial Sorcery 🙂

Personally, I don’t see anything wrong with marketing occult or any other products and services intensively and even aggressively, as long as

1) it’s not invasive (such as telephone marketing or even door-to-door)
2) the communication is 100% truthful
3) the product/service you sell can actually solve your target’s problems or fulfill your target’s expectations;
4) optional but very much appreciated, the product/service is great value for money

I realize that most things that are marketed in an intense and aggressive way don’t meet these requirements, what I’m saying is, they should, and they very well could. “Hard” and even cheesy marketing does not necessarily mean scam or even low quality. I used to be a harsh critic of marketing in any form, but after being forced to learn it as well as I could to save my own business, I realize how useful it can actually be for the buyers themselves, provided the above requirements are met.

In fact, if you DO meet these requirements, and you DON’T market your stuff vigorously, you are probably doing a great disservice to your potential customers/clients. How many people are buying lower quality material because they don’t know about you?

“Articles for content are there for content”.

I find it hard to compartmentalize the two things so distinctly. Marketing has a lot to do with proving value, and providing free quality content for your target audience does just that. It domonstrates value. While I’m happy to provide highly useful and interesting free content for my readers, I’m also hoping that doing so will establish my authority in my field and increase my sales. So in a sense, articles for content are part of the marketing too, don’t you think?

Reply
Bn

“Your webpage or blog should look like a resource for students and researchers; it should not look like an ad.”

The key phrasing here is “should LOOK LIKE” – if your blog is something to be mainly used for selling things and services, by all means, it’s allowed to look like it!

@Stone Dog:
“2) the communication is 100% truthful
3) the product/service you sell can actually solve your target’s problems or fulfill your target’s expectations;”

I think that 100%-truthfulness and occultism share a supremely complex relationship, even without the obvious power dynamics of money involved – and when even medical science can’t garantuee the efficacy of its problem-solving, how is magic is supposed to?
Sure, you can opt for the 100%-truth and tell people exactly what you’re doing, that you can’t guarantee results, reference past experiences and then leave ’em to make the choice about employing you, but that in itself is also another level of influencing people: “Oh, he is so honest and open with me, that must mean he’s the real deal and not just a money-grabbing predator!”- and that’s just the top of it.
I think that Ramsey Dukes is right when he says that the element of sleaze (or, obfuscation or manipulation, if you prefer) can’t really be eliminated from occultism at all, because it’s inherently part of its makeup- and of its liberating charm as well!
http://the-philosophers-stone.com/articles/charlatn/magus.htm

Reply
    Stone Dog

    You bring up good points.

    It should go without saying that “100% truthful” applies to the truth as you currently know and understand it. I realize there is an epistemological problem inherent in requirement 2), I meant truthful in a moral sense, if you will. “Sincere” might be a more appropriate term.

    Maybe my phrasing wasn’t clear. By 3), I don’t mean that the results must be guaranteed, I mean that the results CAN be obtained, i.e. you can be reasonably optimistic that the advertised product service will elicit the desired event. There are obviously too many factors at play to guarantee anything in our field, but still, the third requirement can easily be met.

    Think for example of a talisman that is advertised as a powerful business-booster, or whatever.
    If you have consistently created effective talismans in the past, you have worked hard on this new one, and you have done your best to verify it’s power with divination, requirement 3) is met by my standards.
    If you have just bought a batch of trinkets and lazily blessed them during a standard daily offering, fully knowing that they won’t have the intended effect for most people, it is not.

    As for honesty being in itself a means of influence, I guess this goes back to “you cannot NOT influence people”.
    If you accept that statement (as I do), and if you agree with Jason that money must rank very high in your priorities if you are hoping to pay your bills with this stuff (as again, I do), then honesty and actual commitment to your clients’ needs are obviously the morally soundest ways to influence people.
    Generating gratitude, appreciation, trust, and therefore reciprocity and loyalty, is indeed the foundation of my personal marketing approach. But that’s just the healthy way to build relationships, both on the personal and the financial level. So I don’t see a problem in that.

    Reply
Andrè M. Pietroschek

I liked your “Who am I”. Historically charging money was “black magic” or for frauds, as the powers themselves were written to recompense the ‘good aka shiny white’ practitioners. Still nowadays, especially living straight within a capitalist society contrary to classic shaman in the wilderness, that definition would be outdated.

Asking money for services provided IS a legitimate way of business. Well, until one cheats the tax office or customers. As if we have less rights than any street-artist.

But it does go beyond that. When “we” work for free we do sabotage the works of those who do the esoteric-conventions & similar. In Western Europe the outdated ‘good form’ could even result in a visit from people who demand you at least charge standard fees or start worrying about your knee-caps (to use a cliche on it instead of ill-simplifying it Occult-Mafia). 😉

Reply
Ulysses

I too prefer the open approach. When someone teies to hide a sales pitch, itinsultsme.

Reply
For Love of Paint Pens | Pagan Church Lady

[…]  I’ve made another with a special sigil of Jupiter that comes from Jason Miller’s Financial Sorcery book – I can’t share it here but can encourage you to check it out if you are […]

Reply
Pinoy Tv Serial

I enjoyed reading this a lot… I really hope to read a lot more of your posts within the future, so I’ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn’t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website’s like this 1, I like to share it with other people So I’ve developed a backlink to your site (from …

Reply
prom limousine

Can I just now say that of a relief to locate somebody who truly knows what theyre speaking about online. You truly know how to bring a difficulty to light and work out it crucial. The diet need to see this and appreciate this side on the story. I cant believe youre no far more popular since you definitely possess the gift.

Reply

Leave a Reply: