11

Transcending Tools? More Like Misunderstanding Them.

20160503_104744Every now and then I meet someone who claims that they have transcended the need for tools or any link to traditional methods.

Transcending Tools? More like misunderstanding them.

That’s like transcending the need for a car or a plane because you can walk to main street. On the one hand walking is free and healthier and gives you a more detailed look at the terrain. On the other hand a car will get you there faster, and the car and plane will get you places you cannot walk to in reasonable amount of time at all.

In short: its not a question of whether you need tools or not, but what you need them for.

I have a background in Tibetan Tantra which has an interesting relationship with its tools. On the one hand we are talking about some of the most detailed, complex, and painstaking preparations of physical equipment to be found in pretty much any tradition. On the other hand you have many Lamas instructing their students to visualize offerings, use mudras when they don’t have a tool, and in general not obsess over the “stuff”. This is supported by a Mahasiddha tradition where beer jugs (or in Drukpa Kunlegs example , his dick) gets used as Bumpas (Vases).

So what gives? Are tools something to be transcended or should we be using them in everything we do?

The answer lies in exactly WHAT you are trying to do. Doing a daily practice should require little physical equipment. “You should be able to do your practice in prison” Lama Kunga once told me. On the other hand if you are doig a working where you are asking for a physical result, you should have some physical tools making waves. If you are looking for a dream vision of a spirit, a lamp in conjunction with some dream yoga will do the trick, but if you are looking to evoke an entity and have a conversation in your waking state, you should have proper tools to bring it into this reality, at least for initial contact.

In The Sorcerer’s Secrets I gave a short spell to invoke the presence of Bune from the Goetia of Solomon*, that requires nothing more than a seal and a circle. A few people took issue with the lack of equipment given in that book for a full evocation. What they failed to read is that this was not at all meant to be a full evocation. It’s a spell to request aid.  You can build upon it for sure but it is not an evocation.

There are levels of manifestation of spirits. There are levels of ceremonial complexity. There are levels of how much “magic” you should toss at any given situation. Going balls to the wall, max-that-you can, is not always the answer.

For instance, going back to Tibetan practice as an example. If we demanded that EVERY Vajrakilaya Sadhana be performed with multiple, freshly made tormas, full tantric costume, and Phurbas made with the three irons**, and so on, daily practice would be impossible. It is better to rely on mudras, visualizations, re-usable Tormas, and such so that you can actually DO the practice daily, which is the main point. If however you are going to USE Vajrakilaya to do an exorcism of a place, or kill liberate someone, a lot more attention to physical supports should be used. Unless your relationship with Kilaya is very advanced because of prior work, then perhaps you need less and can maybe use less tools and ceremony (or in Drukpa Kunlegs example , his dick).

But chances are you are NOT a Mahasiddha or a great Saint of any kind. Over and over when I workshop peoples rituals that are not getting results I see people not taking advantage of tools and materia because they believe that they have somehow transcended the need. In fact, the whole reason that New Page Books contacted me to write my first book was because of a Witchvox Article that I wrote refuting the previous three weeks of posting on that site about how tools don’t matter, and how everything is intent.

Tools DO matter, and should be in accord with what you are trying to do.

Now, what tools you use, and how traditional they must be is another matter that I will take up later this week.

Stay Tuned.

 

 

 

 

*Yes, I contributed to Bune becoming overpopularized.  He was like the damn Katy Perry of Demons for a while…

**Iron from Meteorites, Iron from Earth, Iron from a weapon that has killed someone.

Click Here to Leave a Comment Below 11 comments
Sunfell

Having gone through a Hardwarian stage in my own journey, I’ve succumbed to the attraction of tools, toys, costumes and other ritual swag. I got rid of most of it when I hit the wall a decade ago, and to be honest, don’t miss a lot of it at all. But tools are necessary- for me, they help externalize what I’m doing, and separate myself from the act, so the action can happen. Whether it’s drawing a sigil, dressing a candle, or creating ritual space, the act of preparation helps tune my mind to the task at hand.

Being a techie, I liken the type and depth of magical tools needed and used in working to the kind of digital tool I need in my mundane life. If I’m checking email, my phone is fine. If I need to work with images or watch video, the tablet works. If I need to mess around with complex audio or video files and tweak digital synths and use a digital audio workstation, then I fire up the ‘big iron’ for that. Right tool for the job.

It was fun collecting the tools and toys back in the day, though. I sometimes miss the fun of the hunt.

Reply
André

Thank you a lot!!!!

Reply
Sef Salem

Brilliant piece, and reminds me greatly of how Crowley is always chastised for changing his position during the course of his lifetime – of course he did!

But more than that, having context for ritual practice and equipment is hugely important. I’ve been working back through Trithemius and the Armadel recently, and having another go-around with a full set of consecrated tools in a way I never did as a teenaged sorcerer is giving some really impressive and surprising results, but I still *did* all those evocations at the start of my journey with whatever I could cobble together.

Thanks, Jason.

Reply
Ryan Loyd

Though I agree with the latter part of what you had to say and it was a good point- the “misunderstanding” analogy of walking vs driving I had a problem with. To transcend a tool, means you can do the job as well or better and more efficiently without it. If they are Not getting as good, or as efficient methods and results, then they have not transcended tools or surpassed foci.
Generally we’re still using or doing the *thing* the tool was a symbol for, we just don’t need the physical symbolic representation to do it.
sure, sometimes they are still the most efficient option, for myriad reasons, (and if you know what you’re doing, as you said in the latter part of your essay, you can roll with whatever you’ve got to hand just fine) but if you’ve truly transcended one then using it is pointless, beyond pageantry. I mean, why wave a stick around in the air, when you could have had that *thing* done at the speed of thought before you even managed to pick it up?
All in all good essay.

Reply
D. Forster

To be honest it’s not something I’d like to take a hard line on. Sometimes I use tools, and I enjoy that, other times I like to keep it simple and enjoy the purity of that. It can also be a matter of convenience.

In the tradition I follow various tools are made along the way, and each has a specific meaning for the magician. To me this helps to personalise the work at each stage and in this way helps to shape the magician him/herself. But while these tools are made as a formal part of the curriculum it’s what they represent that is of real importance, which is why serious meditation and reflection goes into their construction and consecration.

In a pinch I’ll use my finger as a wand and a slice of bread for a pantacle, or nothing at all. It depends on the work and the result I want.

A friend and teacher of mine once gave me a piece of advice that stuck with me: “There’s nothing more ridiculous than a swordsman that can’t fight without a sword”.

In my opinion the same goes for magicians.

Reply
J.J.

Nobody says a chef is a bad chef because s/he used a new food processor. You still need the cooking skill for it to be worth anything. Why should it be different in magic?

Reply
Mica Gries

Personally, my favourite discussion on magical tools comes from Josephine McCarthy
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/539af6bee4b0cef061847e36/t/5464fb85e4b0f132d8cd8760/1415904133812/QUAREIA_M5_L1.pdf

Reply
    Mica Gries

    BTW, the above link is NOT spam in case anyone is wondering. It is a pdf file from the Quareia course

    Reply
Josh

I think I have always had trouble understanding exactly what the tools were for. For a long time the only tools I used were a notebook and a pen, which works well as a sword/wand and a pentacle. However, I don’t see the point in having a “wand” and “pentacle” if I didn’t actually do anything with them during the ritual.

During a ritual I did recently out in the wilderness I was thinking about tools and looked at the tools I had brought. A book with the spell in it (Sorcerer’s Secret actually), a lighter, a charcoal, a jar of incense, some forceps for holding the coal while lighting it, and a stick I picked up to draw a circle in the dirt. Looking at the items during the ritual I realized I had a wand(the lighter and the stick), a sword (the forceps), a cup(the jar) and a pentacle (the book) all for more or less “practical” reasons and it started to click for me.

I have a chalice I carved on a lathe when I was a teenager on my altar and a wand made of purple driftwood that I found in a synchronistic event. However, I still have trouble using them in any rituals unless they fulfill a very literal purpose.

Reply
Ron Ritzer

I’m a minimalist and I’ve attempted to streamline my magical practices in that direction quite a bit. But at the end of the day I’m not going to handle volatile chemicals without gloves and I’m not going to try to put screws into the wall with a butter knife, and the same goes for magical practice. You gotta have the proper personal protective equipment and you need the right tools for the job.
While my minimalist values are rooted in anti-consumer culture and commercialization, there is a part of me that really appreciates a skeletal and streamlined kit. Some of the versions of the KoS seem to tend so far in excess it’s decadent, but the GV and the MToS are quite simplified in terms of tools and lean a bit closer towards what I consider a very ceremonial form of folk magic.
At the end of the day it’s a matter of preference but I do firmly believe at the end of the say there are still a bare minimum of required physical objects regardless of what you are doing.

Reply

Leave a Reply: